, ,

Sports Betting Data Property: Response to Grimmelmann and Mulligan

73 Am. U. L. Rev. F. 79 (2024).

By Ryan M. Rodenberg*
, ,

Duet Your Joint Work: How Songwriters Open Themselves Up to Joint Authorship with “Open Verse Challenges” on TikTok

73 Am. U. L. Rev. F. 43 (2023).

By India-Grace Kellogg*
, ,

Chasing Losses with Credit: The Dangers of the Absence of Financial Instrument Restrictions in State Gambling Law

73 Am. U. L. Rev. F. 1 (2023).

By Griffen Dresner*
, ,

In Controversy: The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act Federal Jurisdiction Requirements and Why the 9th Circuit Is Right that Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees Should Count Towards the Amount in Controversy

72 Am. U. L. Rev. F. 157 (2023).

By Gabrielle Scanlin-Sherman*
, ,

Standing on Immigrant Subordination

72 Am. U. L. Rev. F. 147 (2023).

By Alina Das*
, ,

Presumptive Use of Pretrial Risk Assessment Instruments

72 Am. U. L. Rev. F. 133 (2023).

By Christopher Slobogin*
, ,

Beyond Duress: Supporting the Admissibility Of Evidence Of Battered Woman Syndrome to Aid the Defenses of Battered Mothers Charged with Failing to Protect Their Children Against Their Common Abuser

72 Am. U. L. Rev. F. 93 (2023).

By Emily Small*
, ,

Inherently Coercive Entry: ICE’s Use of Unconstitutional Ruses

72 Am. U. L. Rev. F. 59 (2022).

By Karla J. Manzanares*
, ,

Unequal Justice: Why Federal Courts Should Adopt the Individualized Approach to Sentencing Defendants Convicted of Drug Conspiracy

72 Am. U. L. Rev. F. 19 (2022).

By Alexis S. Hughes
, ,

Response to Wasserman And Rhodes: The Texas S.B. 8 Litigation and “Our Formalism”

72 Am. U. L. Rev. F. 1 (2022).

By B. Jessie Hill*
Load More