Patent Law—Utility Requirement in Pharmaceutical Application Satisfied by Tests on Animals—In re Hartop et al., 311 F.3d 249 (C.C.P.A. 1962).

By Michael Dinnin Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

Administrative Law—The Use of the Interim Order Procedure to Effect Refund—Federal Power Commisssion v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Company, 371 U.S. 145 (1962).

By Robert Lee Marlar Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

Federal Tax Liens—Priority—State Classification of Foreclosure Procedure Cannot Avoid Priority of Federal Tax Lien—United States v. Buffalo Savings Bank, 371 U.S. 228 (1963).

By Robert A. Clancy Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

Labor Law—Labor Management Relations Act—State Courts May Entertain Employee’s Suit for Unfair Labor Practice Which is Breach of Collective Agreement Arising Under § 301—Smith v. Evening News Association, 371 U.S. 195 (1962).

By James J. Lombardi Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

Attorneys—Practice of Law by a Corporation—Right of a Nonprofit Corporation to Solicit Clients for Gratuitously Furnished Legal Assistance in Civil Rights Actions—National Ass’n for the Advancement of Colored People, Inc. v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963).

By Jonathan P. Marget Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

BOOK REVIEW: World Habeas Corpus

By Edwin M. Slote Click here to view this Book Review

By AU Law Review

BOOK REVIEW: One Man’s Stand for Freedom

By Robert T. Goostree Click here to view this Book Review

By AU Law Review

BOOK REVIEW: In Brief Authority

By Matthew F. McGuire Click here to view this Book Review

By AU Law Review

BOOK REVIEW: Essays in Jurisprudence in Honor of Roscoe Pound

By John Sherman Myers Click here for this Book Review

By AU Law Review
Load More