Volume 16, Issue 1

Volume 16, Issue 1

The Emerging Lawyer and Legal Education

By Charles B. Nutting Click here to view this Article

By AU Law Review

Volume 16, Issue 1

The Military “Search Warrant”

By Murl A. Larkin Click here to view this Article

By AU Law Review

Volume 16, Issue 1

“Sliding Scale” or “Indexation” Clauses in French Law

By Jean Phillipe Levy Click here to view this Article

By AU Law Review

Volume 16, Issue 1

COMMENT: The Patent Law and the Supreme Court, October Term, 1965

By Frederick E. McKelvey Click here to view this Comment

By AU Law Review

Volume 16, Issue 1

NOTE: Administrative Law—Standing—Responsible Representatives of the Listening Public May Have Standing to Challenge Renewal of a Broadcast License: {{United Church of Christ v. FCC}}, — U.S. App. D.C. —, 359 F.2d 994 (1966)

By John G. De Gooyer Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

Volume 16, Issue 1

NOTE: Attorney and Client—Requirement of Compensation of Trial Counsel Appointed for Indigent: {{State v. Rush}}, 46 N.J. 399, 217 A.2d 441 (1966)

By Michael N. Klar Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

Volume 16, Issue 1

NOTE: Constitutional Law—Establishment of Religion—State Grants to Certain Sectarian Schools Violates First Amendment: {{Horace Mann League of U.S. v. Board of Pub. Works}}, 242 Md. 645, 220 A.2d 51 (1966)

By David Michael McLean Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

Volume 16, Issue 1

NOTE: Constitutional Law—First Amendment—Evidence of Pandering in the Advertising and Sale of Material May Be Probative with Respect to the Obscene Nature of the Material: {{Ginzburg v. United States}}, 383 U.S. 463 (1966)

By Charles Phillip Schiller Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

Volume 16, Issue 1

NOTE: Constitutional Law—Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection—State Poll Tax Prerequisite to Voting—Denial of Equal Protection: {{Harper v. Virginia State Bd. of Elections}}, 383 U.S. 663 (1966)

By Karen Skrinseth Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

Volume 16, Issue 1

NOTE: Constitutional Law—Search and Seizure—Nonconsensual Drawing of Blood Valid for Evidential Purposes: {{Schmerber v. California}}, 384 U.S. 757 (1966)

By Carl A. Eklund Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

The Emerging Lawyer and Legal Education

The Military “Search Warrant”

“Sliding Scale” or “Indexation” Clauses in French Law

COMMENT: The Patent Law and the Supreme Court, October Term, 1965

NOTE: Administrative Law—Standing—Responsible Representatives of the Listening Public May Have Standing to Challenge Renewal of a Broadcast License: {{United Church of Christ v. FCC}}, — U.S. App. D.C. —, 359 F.2d 994 (1966)

NOTE: Attorney and Client—Requirement of Compensation of Trial Counsel Appointed for Indigent: {{State v. Rush}}, 46 N.J. 399, 217 A.2d 441 (1966)

NOTE: Constitutional Law—Establishment of Religion—State Grants to Certain Sectarian Schools Violates First Amendment: {{Horace Mann League of U.S. v. Board of Pub. Works}}, 242 Md. 645, 220 A.2d 51 (1966)

NOTE: Constitutional Law—First Amendment—Evidence of Pandering in the Advertising and Sale of Material May Be Probative with Respect to the Obscene Nature of the Material: {{Ginzburg v. United States}}, 383 U.S. 463 (1966)

NOTE: Constitutional Law—Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection—State Poll Tax Prerequisite to Voting—Denial of Equal Protection: {{Harper v. Virginia State Bd. of Elections}}, 383 U.S. 663 (1966)

NOTE: Constitutional Law—Search and Seizure—Nonconsensual Drawing of Blood Valid for Evidential Purposes: {{Schmerber v. California}}, 384 U.S. 757 (1966)

Contact Us

Join Our Mailing List