BOOK REVIEW: Rines: Create or Perish: The Case for Inventions and Patents

By Horace B. Fay, Jr. Click here to view this Book Review

By AU Law Review

BOOK REVIEW: Lewis: Gideon’s Trumpet

By Gary Bellow Click here to view this Book Review

By AU Law Review

BOOK REVIEW: Rice: The Supreme Court and Public Prayer (The Need for Restraint)

By James C. Kirby, Jr. Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

NOTE: Divorce-Military Personnel-Residence Rather Than Domicile as the Basis for Jurisdiction. Lauterbach v. Lauterbach, 392 P.2d 24 (Alaska 1964)

By Joe G. Cobb Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

NOTE: Federal Estate Taxation-Includability of Proceeds of Accident Insurance Policies in Gross Estate of Deceased. Noel v. Commissioner, 332 F.2d 950 (3d Cir. 1964)

By Herbert S. Ezrin Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

NOTE: Torts-Workmen’s Compensation-Mental Breakdown as Compensable Injury Under Longshoreman’s and Harbor Worker’s Compensation Act. American National Red Cross v. Hagen, 327 F.2d 559 (7th Cir. 1964)

By C.K. Townsend, Jr. Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

NOTE: Constitutional Law-Interstate Commerce-State Taxation of Foreign Corporation’s Income Derived from Interstate Activities. International Shoe Co. v. Cocreham, 246 La. 244, 164 So. 2d 314 (1964), cert. denied, 33 U.S.L. Week 3170 (U.S. Nov. 9, 1964)

By Martin Shad Hanna Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

NOTE: Torts-Fathering an Adulterine Bastard a Tort Against the Child. Zepeda v. Zepeda, 41 Ill. App. 2d 240, 190 N.E.2d 849 (1963)

By Sheldon S. Gilbert Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

NOTE: Patents-Sufficiency of Disclosure-Utility Requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 101 for Chemical Process Claims. In re Manson, 333 F.2d 234, 142 U.S.P.Q. 35 (C.C.P.A. 1964)

By J.C. Holman Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review

NOTE: Conflict of Laws-Contracts-Constitutionality of Choice of Law-Application of Statute of Forum Nullifying Twelve Month Suit Clause in Foreign Insurance Contract, Valid in State Where Made, Does not Violate Constitutional Due Process. Clay v. Sun Ins.

By Robert J. Oberst Click here to view this Note

By AU Law Review